Frequently Asked Questions
About COR Work
1. What is the Club of Rome?
2. Why is no work being done with the Club of Rome lately?
1. What is the Club of Rome?
According to their website,
the Club of Rome is:
"...a global think tank and centre of innovation
and initiative. As a non-profit, non governmental organization
(NGO), it brings together scientists, economists, businessmen,
international high civil servants, heads of state and
former heads of state from all five continents who are
convinced that the future of humankind is not determined
once and for all and that each human being can contribute
to the improvement of our societies."
In the 1970s and 80s the Club of Rome was the best known and
most effective environmental NGO in the world, due to one phenomenal
success: correct identification of what is now widely acknowledged
as the biggest, most urgent problem in the world.
This is the
global environmental sustainability problem. It was described
and communicated in easy-to-read format by the runaway best
seller Limits to Growth in 1972, which went on to
become the top selling environmental book of all time, at
about 30 million copies. This compares to about 10 million
copies for Silent Spring. What is even more astounding
is Limits
to Growth was a technical book, written in layman's
language. It was not an easy read. But its basic thesis,
that civilization was about to overshoot its environmental
limits and that this would lead to collapse unless civilization
drastically change course, was so revolutionary that tens
of millions read it anyhow. What they read was a book based
on a novel, irrefutable computer simulation model of how
society and the environment interacted, complete with simulation
run scenarios about what probably would or would not happen
depending on what course society chose.
As a result of the Limits to Growth project, the
Club of Rome enjoyed immense prestige and influence for years.
But it was a first-time-up-at-bat home run that was never repeated.
Subsequent reports, projects, conferences, and work have led
to very little of tangible value. Today, while some remember
the Club for what it once was, most view it as just another
early player in the history of the environmental movement.
However, the Club still maintains branches in about 40 countries
and holds an annual conference.
2. Why is no work being done with the
Club of Rome lately?
This is a delicate matter. It appears the US Association of
the Club of Rome, USACOR,
has had an allergic reaction to the concepts at Thwink.org.
COR, the international Club of Rome, has been fine to work
with. But USACOR has been less so, though a few of its members
have been very supportive of these new ideas.
Like most environmental organizations, the Club of Rome has
not been achieving its objectives lately. So after I became
a member of USACOR in January of 2006, in an effort to help
out I performed an assessment of the Club's process maturity.
This was published in their internal newsletter. The paper
is titled Can These Best Practices Make the Club Effective
Once Again? It caused quite a stir in the organization.
You can read it here, at Best Practices
Paper.
An assessment of where you are today is standard business
practice as the first step for serious organizational improvement.
Unfortunately, it received a non-standard reaction. The powers
that be at USACOR were so upset about the conclusions in the
paper and what they implied, that I have been booted out of
the club, on the pretense that my membership was approved at
a board meeting that did not have a quorum. Well, what really
happened is this is another case of shooting the messenger,
combined with a heavy addiction to Classic
Activism. Shooting the messenger is another name for change
resistance.
Read the Best Practices paper and decide for yourself:
Was this a case of shooting the messenger or not?
Perhaps, after the great stream of life takes a few more twists
and turns for all of us, I will be able to work with the
Club again.